This is a slight rework of a post I made on an old blog back in 2011, with a bit of an update to elaborate on a couple of points.
Originally this was in response to an article written by a particularly well known photographer claiming to “bust” some myths that his article actually end up reinforcing and propagating (which might explain why his post now seems to have magically vanished from the web).
I’d had a little back and forth on Twitter with this person regarding his new article and why PPI doesn’t matter when resizing images for digital display (meaning, on the screen, on the web, via digital projector running off a laptop, via a mobile device, whatever) which he claimed was a myth, and that it does matter.
That’s “clouds”, as in, “those pretty white balls of fluffy stuff in the sky that are actually just big masses of static rain when you’re standing inside them”.
At some point around the middle of 2013, fellow photographer and good friend Graham Binns got in touch, as he does from time to time, to ask if I’d be interested and able to assist on a shoot.
I’ve assisted Graham before, a couple of times, and he’s assisted me in the past, too. Whenever Graham and I get together, no matter who’s shooting, I know it’s going to be a fantastic day, we’re both going to come home exhausted, probably in a great deal of pain, and at least one of us will get wet.
So, of course, I said yes.
I started off in film and jumped wholeheartedly into digital back in 2002 when the Nikon D100 was released.
It was supposed to be a short break from film. I’d always intended to return to it at some point and shoot the two side by side, but I was smitten by digital and it was a good 10 years before I finally pulled my Nikon N90s back out of retirement.
One thing I’d never done when I originally shot film was to develop and print it myself. This is something I wanted to correct when I started again (prompted by the acquisition of a Nikkormat FTn for the princely sum of £1 at a local car boot sale).
A couple of weeks ago, I had the pleasure of spending four and a bit days at the International Centre for Birds of Prey at Duncombe Park in Helmsley, Yorkshire.
I go to a number of game fairs and falconry fairs throughout each year, sometimes for work and sometimes for personal pleasure, but this one was a little something extra. As well as being ICBP Duncombe’s first Raptor Fair, which looks set to become a great annual event, I was to photograph some of their display birds.
Of course, I photographed the birds during the displays themselves, as I often do at such events, darting about the arena and hopping from post to post, but I wanted to give them something a bit special.
Most people who use flash understand that your sync speed is the maximum shutter speed with which you can use flash. What people generally don’t know is why.
“My camera goes all the way up to 1/8000th of a second, so why can’t I use flash past 1/250th?”
Well, this is really all down to how your shutter works in a DSLR. The types of shutters in DSLRs are called “focal-plane shutters”.
My reply to the question posed in the title of this post is usually something along the lines of, “It depends. What type of baby?”
Then the conversation tends to go one of three ways.
The first two answers are the obvious ones. I either hear “a little boy” or, not surprisingly, “a little girl”.
The third answer is my favourite, and the one I seem to hear most often; “It’s a baby [insert random non-human species here].”
It’s not that I have anything against kids, you understand, but if you want the absolute best photographs of your new children, go find somebody who’s good at photographing babies and LOVES doing it.
The images will be worth it!
When it comes to animals, however, it’s a whole different story.
So, this is interesting, and while datacolor have had a Spyder option for a while, its calibration is limited to its own software (unless it’s changed since I last took a proper look at it).
This new offering from X-Rite, released in March, looks rather good, though, and it seems it has an API that allows other app developers to add support for the profiles it creates (meaning other software can show your images correctly, too – Hello? Lightroom Mobile? You listening, Adobe?).
There are, however, a couple of things that annoy me slightly about it, although one kind of negates the other (for me anyway).
I get why they put a gap at the top of the posts & pages in the Twenty Fourteen WordPress Theme, but it’s a little inconsistent (aesthetically speaking). The gap does make blog posts without a feature image look just right, and fit & flow they way they should.
If, however, your post has a feature image, it just looks awkward (to me, anyway), and as the goal for me is try to to always have a feature image for each blog post, I decided to go ahead and remove the gap.
It’ll also force me to update those older posts at some point to add a feature image.